Postcard from Perth 47
Perth Fringe World (Weeks 1 and 2): MKA Being Dead; Zoe Coombs Marr, Dave 2; Maude Davey, My Life in the Nude; Laura Davis, Ghost Machine
I’ve concentrated my Fringe-foraging over the past couple of
weeks on the Summer Nights Season at The Blue Room and PICA – with occasional
forays to tent-venues nearby – and followed my own personal interest in theatre
rather than comedy, cabaret or circus. Nevertheless much of what I’ve ended up
seeing has been performed by solo artists and had a decidedly burlesque feel.
Perhaps I’ve simply succumbed to the overall Fringe vibe, but the idea of seeing
a conventional (or even unconventional) ‘play’ somehow hasn’t appealed to me as
much as watching an individual artist expose themselves one way or another and
lay it on the line, so to speak, both personally and creatively. It’s made me
wonder how much live performance in general – and ‘fringe’ performance in
particular – appeals to the underlying voyeurism of audiences (and
the corresponding exhibitionism of performers). Certainly in the context of Perth Fringe World – which mostly takes place in and around Northbridge – there's an element of the carnival and even the freak-show which astute artists know how to exploit and subvert at the same time.
The most interesting works I’ve seen at Fringe foreground
the contradictions between exposure and intimacy, public and private, persona
and self – especially in the context of gender and sexuality. Melbourne company
MKA Writers Theatre have brought two productions to this year’s Fringe World: a
return season of Mark Wilson’s Unsex Me
and Kerith Manderson-Galvin’s Being Dead:
Don Quixote. I wrote about Unsex Me when
I saw it as part of last year’s Fringe at the pop-up Noodle Palace venue in the
disused Picadilly Cinema. Perhaps inevitably I found the impact of the show somewhat
diminished on seeing it a second time, particularly in the (comparatively)
conventional and familiar black-box performance space at PICA. Wilson and his
sofa seemed dwarfed by the dimensions of the space and the steeply raked
auditorium, as opposed to the seedy confines of the former flea-pit cinema,
where he loomed over us on a small raised dais in front of the screen while we cowered
together in the front rows, unsure of where the microphone (or the lubricrant)
might go next. In fact the whole experience of going to the Picadilly Arcade –
in an area of the Perth CBD which is largely deserted at night – made it seem even
more like visiting some kind of weird peep-show. Once again, I found myself
thinking about the importance of venue in a fringe context, and indeed the
whole notion of having a ‘fringe’ experience.
Being Dead: Don
Quixote is in some ways a less ‘accomplished’ work than Unsex Me, but I found Kerith
Manderson-Galvin’s deliberately artless stage persona totally engaging and in
its own way as provocative as Wilson’s more barnstorming variety of camp. In
keeping with the now-established aesthetics of post-dramatic theatre or
contemporary performance, this isn’t character-acting or even stand-up comedy,
but a deliberate subversion of both. As she admonishes us at the outset (in a
style which owes as much to Cervantes as the content does): ‘Remember, there’s
no piece of art so bad that it doesn’t have something good in it.’
The text is a collage derived in part from New York novelist
Kathy Acker’s punk surrealist take on Don
Quixote, and in part from Manderson-Galvin’s own imagination and/or
experience (in keeping with Acker’s own literary and personal blend of autobiography
and intertextuality, it’s pointless even attempting to distinguish between the
two). In Acker’s novel, the Don becomes a post-structuralist, post-feminist,
post-heterosexual woman wandering the cities of the world on an impossible
quest for love (which neither male nor female partners seem capable of
satisfying). Being Dead transplants
elements of this story to post-punk suburban Melbourne, and beyond that, into
the world of cyberspace and internet dating sites, where gender and sexual
identity become ever-more unfixed and fluid.
Like Cervantes and Acker, Manderson-Galvin’s work (and perhaps
implicitly her own quest as an artist and a lover) are comic and tragic at the
same time. Occasionally accompanied by a guitar-playing male sidekick, she
alternates between playing a version of herself, a version of the Don in male drag,
and an air-headed female version of Sancho Panza, while delivering audience-patter,
making confessions, telling stories, dancing, singing or lip-synching pop songs
(which may or may not correspond with the words that appear karaoke-style on
the screen behind her) and even leading an audience in an enthusiastic sing-along
at the end. There are also some quite beautiful projections of scene-titles
featuring paintings, drawings and artwork, presumably by Manderson-Galvin
herself.
All in all, it’s a glorious mess with a serious purpose: how
to find not just true love but one’s true self (necessarily gendered and
sexualized, however fluidly) in a crazy world which is totally mediated by
second-hand fictions. In other words: we are all Don Quixote now.
*
Actor, writer, comedian and performance artist Zoe Coombs Marr
(who is also a member of Sydney-based contemporary performance group Post) took
these questions to the next level with her dizzyingly meta-theatrical clown-show
tour-de-force Dave 2: Trigger Warning,
which I saw the following week around the corner from PICA in the Deluxe tent
opposite the WA Museum. Her drag clown-persona ‘Dave’ is a foul-mouthed but
touchingly inept male sexist stand-up comedian; in this show, he claims to have
recently returned from a stint doing clown workshops with renowned real-life
French theatre guru Philippe Gaulier, who is notorious for his extreme approach
to clowning, his provocative teaching style and overarching philosophy of
theatre as a form of ‘play’ or ‘game’ (‘le
jeu’). A true confession of my own is order here: like generations of intrepid
performers before and after me, I too made the pilgrimage to France to study with
Gaulier last year as part of my Creative Development Fellowship. As things
panned out, for better or worse I spent a month there immediately after my
marriage imploded, with the result that my already damaged ego was further
deconstructed on the classroom floor: a combined emotional and artistic ordeal
from which I’m still in the process of recovering. So I had a vested interest
in seeing how Coombs Marr would tackle the subject of Gaulier, and how her
alter-ego Dave might have survived the encounter.
In the event, just as the character of Dave himself
functions variously as an object of satire, disgust, fascination, pity and even
terror, so Gaulier’s classes and teachings were both mocked and honoured in a
manner absolutely faithful to the style and philosophy of Gaulier himself.
Indeed, the hallucinatory denouement of the show – when Dave trips and falls, fake
blood begins pouring down his face and the party drugs he has taken earlier
begin to kick in with demented effect – was pure Gaulier in its senseless and transgressive
energy. In fact Dave is less of a ‘clown’ than an instance of that other, very
different and highly specialized performance archeytpe which Gaulier teaches
under the aegis of ‘the buffoon’ (‘le
bouffon’): a kind of medieval fool who is despised and pilloried while also
capable of embodying and uttering society’s otherwise unspeakable and
unrepresentable truths (Sacha Baren-Cohen and Chris Lilly being two contemporary
celebrity practitioners). As such, Dave
2: Trigger Warning goes beyond the realms of both stand-up comedy and
political satire and enters a zone of Dionysian ecstasy which on the night I
saw it drove the audience wild by the end of the show. For me, though, the most
thrilling sequence came earlier, when Dave climbs into and ‘mounts’ a lower-body
puppet clown-suit (complete with diminutive false legs dangling from its
shoulders) and then does a kind of recursive auto-ventriloquist act in which he
impersonates his own ‘boring unfunny feminist clown’, whose name is Zoe Coombs
Marr. Self and persona, gender and performance, here become for a moment
exhilaratingly reversible.
*
Earlier that week I ventured down the other end of James
Street to see Maude Davey present My Life
in the Nude at the Casa Mondo tent in the Pleasure Garden. Like Coombs
Marr, Davey is an interdisciplinary artist who has appeared as an actor in
theatre, film and TV as well as having led a ‘shadow’ existence for decades as
a queer feminist burlesque performer specializing in various stages of undress.
Now in her early fifties, and still looking great, she breaks the ice early in
the show by casually discarding her dressing gown and performing most of the
rest of the show in the nude or with judiciously chosen additions – ranging
from high-heels to headgear, wigs, jewellery, nipple-pasties, a G-string (pointedly
worn back to front), a gorilla suit (reminiscent of both Cabaret and Marlene Dietrich’s surprise-entrance in Morocco) and – from Maude’s own early career
as her burlesque alter-ego Ms Wicked – a surprise-entrance of an altogether
different kind by a concealed strawberry. This and other cameo-highlights are
interspersed with stories and reflections about her life and times, in what
emerges as a disarmingly entertaining, honest, inclusive, thoughtful and
personal meditation about performance, gender, sexuality and feminism,
especially in the changing context of queer theatre and burlesque in Melbourne
and Sydney over the last few decades. Maude is however originally from Perth,
and she safely navigated a mostly mainstream, middle-class, middle-aged Perth audience
through the material with a reassuring smile even when wearing a beard,
stripping down to her cosh and seducing a woman in the front row.
The closing anecdote was about inviting a performer with
Down Syndrome to take off her clothes in the rehearsal room, and seeing the
translucent beauty of her skin revealed in all its glory. At that moment, she
realised that burlesque was about making a statement: ‘I am beautiful, and I am
worthy of your regard.’ It was a tellingly self-reflexive moment in a show that
for me at least was as much about ageing and mortality as it was about gender
or sexual politics. Or perhaps more simply, it’s a show about the body: her
body, other bodies, our bodies.
Maude first performed My
Life in the Nude at La Mama in Melbourne in 2013, and I hope she’ll still
be doing it – or a version of it – for at least another thirty years. Special
mention should also be made of Deborah Eldred as her severely dressed and
long-faced onstage ‘helper’, and of Anni Davey as the director of the show.
*
The final show I want to write about in this week’s Postcard
is Laura Davis: Ghost Machine, which
I saw at The Blue Room a couple of nights after seeing Unsex Me and Dave 2. Davis
is another home-grown performer (she grew up in the Perth hills but is now
based in Melbourne) whose work combines off-beat stand-up comedy with a layer
of abstract visual theatrical design that borders on live art. In fact she
spends most of the show under a white sheet with cut-out eye-holes (through
which she periodically swigs on a bottle of water), a string of coloured
fairy-lights wrapped around her midriff glowing softly beneath the sheet. Her
head is also lit from above by a desk-lamp attached to a backpack, and the
floor is strewn with a few other practical light sources that she switches on
and off during the show.
The text itself is a stream-of-consciousness monologue of existential
despair and neurotic anxiety, couched in the language of a typical geeky twenty-something
trying to make ends meet emotionally and financially. What makes it interesting
is that it’s being delivered by someone dressed as a ghost (though being concealed
under a sheet also has other connotations) in an unvarying but not unmusical
pitch that borders on a howl of pain but is softened by a wry tone of deadpan
humour in the writing and delivery. If this sounds like heavy-going (or even
Samuel Beckett), there’s an engaging lightness of touch throughout and plenty
of improvisatory comedy, especially in the audience-interaction sections. These
included asking us to share our ‘guilty pleasures’ (masturbation was the first
answer given, although I’m not sure why guilt was involved) and (later in the
show) to consider the question of why we didn’t kill ourselves. I offered
‘fear’ as my first answer, but later regretted not saying ‘love’, which I think
for me is closer to the truth.
I enjoyed the gawky, lo-tech charm of this show immensely,
and would happily come back to see Laura Davis under a sheet in five, ten,
twenty or forty years time (much like Maude Davey in the nude, in fact). Truth
be told, something was lost for me when she came out from under it, so to
speak, in the final part of the show; not that she wasn’t still totally
engaging, but some kind of imaginative spell had been broken. Perhaps it’s the
case that what I enjoy most about this kind of work (as with all the shows
reviewed in this Postcard) is the role of costume, mask or persona – whether it
be cross-gender drag, ‘ghost-drag’ or even nudity itself (which as John Berger
once observed is not the same as being naked) – and the way this enhances what
might otherwise remain stand-up comedy or confessional theatre. In short: it’s
the tension between self and persona that holds my attention and even (in the
case of a virtuoso like Zoe Coombs Marr) keeps me on the edge of my seat.
The French psychoanalyst Lacan said that the two fundamental
neurotic questions were: ‘Why am I a woman or a man?’ and ‘Why I am alive
rather than dead?’ Once again, I’m tempted to answer both questions with
‘love’, but I think the point is that they’re fundamentally unanswerable.
Perhaps the role of the performer (if not the neurotic) is to embody these
questions for us. And if we’re all to some extent neurotics (apart from the
psychotics and perverts among us, who generally don’t need to go to the
theatre), then perhaps that’s why we attend live performance – not to have
these questions answered, but to see them staged in public, beyond the private
theatre of our dreams and fantasies.
*
Perth Fringe World continues until February 21st.
Humph reviews more Fringe shows next week.
No comments:
Post a Comment